Structural Assessment
In-place, removal-condition and damaged-condition analysis of jackets, topsides, modules and subsea structures, including reassessment of ageing assets to current code.
// Service 04
Structural, marine and constructability assessments that answer the question actually being asked — can this be lifted, moved, installed, removed or dismantled safely, and what governs?
Most offshore problems are not analysis problems — they are definition problems. The wrong load case, an unverified weight report or an unstated assumption about crane availability will invalidate a technically perfect calculation.
VORYX technical studies start by pinning down what governs, then analyse it properly. Our team has supervised the fabrication, load-out and installation of the structures being assessed, which changes both what gets checked and what gets flagged.
Studies are sized to the decision they support: a two-week feasibility check to unlock a tender, or a full structural assessment package for marine warranty approval.
In-place, removal-condition and damaged-condition analysis of jackets, topsides, modules and subsea structures, including reassessment of ageing assets to current code.
Lift point and padeye design, sling and spreader arrangements, dynamic amplification and skew load factors, load-out by skidding, SPMT or lift, and grillage and sea-fastening design.
Motion response and barge stability, tie-down design, upending and launch analysis, on-bottom stability during installation, and weather-window and operability criteria.
Yard capability and quay assessment, reception and cutting sequence, temporary support and stability during dismantling, and material segregation and recycling routes.
HAZID, HAZOP, ENVID, dropped object and SIMOPS studies — chaired, documented and closed out with owners and dates against every action.
Design reviews from the perspective of the yard, the vessel and the offshore crew — access, tolerances, installation aids, hook-up and future intervention.
Identify the condition that actually controls before building any model — often a transient case such as load-out, upending or a partially severed structure rather than the operational case.
Weight and CoG reports are challenged against as-built information and, where possible, weighing records. A lift study built on an unverified weight report is a schedule risk, not an engineering deliverable.
ISO 19902 / API RP 2A for structures, DNV-ST-N001 for the marine operation, with load and consequence factors set to the correct operational reference period and alpha factors.
Sling length tolerance, CoG shift, marine growth, corrosion allowance, soil variation and weather exceedance — reported as utilisation trends, not a single pass/fail.
Bring the analysis into HAZID and constructability review so mitigations are engineered, not just recorded as actions.
Package the analysis for MWS review and carry it through comment and approval to certificate of approval.
Work is delivered against the applicable international and regional framework. The codes below are those most commonly governing this scope — the controlling set is confirmed per project and jurisdiction.
Yes — and this is common on ageing assets. We define the minimum survey and inspection scope needed to close the critical gaps, then run the assessment with explicit sensitivity on the remaining unknowns rather than burying them in a conservative blanket assumption.
Yes. We prepare the analysis package to MWS expectations, respond to comments and support the approval process through to certificate issue.
A focused feasibility check — can this be lifted with this vessel, is this cut achievable, will this load-out work — is typically one to three weeks. Full analysis packages for warranty approval run longer and are scoped case by case.
Yes — HAZID, HAZOP, ENVID, SIMOPS and dropped object studies, chaired independently with full documentation and action close-out tracking.
Talk to an engineer who has delivered this scope offshore.
Discuss your project